Welcome to a slightly delayed blog post. The video for this blog post was put on YouTube quite a while ago, in February, but the blog post is only out now as a busy period at work meant that I didn’t get round looking for my protractor earlier. [1] …because I switched to using a protractor when measuring angles I want to stick with this method so that all pencil points are measured the same way.
The Wopex
Unfortunately there’s a lot of Wopex hate going on in some parts of social media where people discuss pencils – and there are very few people defending the Wopex [2]…with Johnny being the most determined defender in the Erasable group on Facebook. Thank you for that.. Luckily the Wopex can convince in the long term: I was very happy to read Deirdre’s blog post where she turned from a Wopex hater (‘I HATE WOPEX’) to someone not only tolerating the Wopex, but even accepting it and it’s advantages (Some quotes: ‘graphite […] actually isn’t that bad’, ‘point retention is great’, ‘if you are writing on toothy [3]As expressed previously, for various reasons I am not keen on the expression ‘toothy paper’, but since this is a direct quote it will be one of the few occasions you can find this word in … Continue reading paper, the WOPEX really shines’).
Suffice to say [4]Yes, I learned that expression when I watched the English version of Star Trek Voyager., I love the Wopex.
Just a quick reminder: Unlike normal wood cased pencils the Wopex uses a wood-plastic-composite instead of wood. The wood-plastic-composite consists mainly of wood and is, in my opinion, orders of magnitude better than pencils that use plastic instead of wood. Not only does the Wopex sharpen better, the lead – extruded together with the pencil – is also of much better quality, too.
In the vial above you can see how the material looks like before it is extruded into a pencil. I got this vial at the Insights X trade fair. The pellets remind me of a company I worked for during my holidays in the 1990s. They were manufacturing extruded pipes and had similar looking pellets. The recycled pellets smelled very much like washing powder. As far as I remember extruding from recycled material was not easy, the material kept expanding in the wrong place resulting in uneven products. Unrelated – but there must be so much knowledge going into the production of a product like the Wopex…
The Staedtler 501 180
I first mentioned the 501 180 in a blog post from 2014, but a few months ago I finally got my hands on one – they are not very common and not easy to come by in the UK. The article number has gives some clues to this sharpener’s purpose: Wopex pencils have article numbers starting with 180 (e.g. 180 40). Staedtler has now switched to using the word Wopex to describe the wood-plastic-composite material, and is not using Wopex anymore to describe pencils made from this material, but independent of how the name Wopex is used, the pencils made from Wopex material still use article numbers starting with 180 (e.g. 180 30 for the new Noris eco).
Article numbers for Staedtler’s rotary (i.e. hand crank) sharpener start with 501 (e.g. the Mars 501 20 rotary sharpener) so 501 180 is the perfect [5]I try to avoid using the word perfect, but in this case it is justified, I think. article number for this sharpener, 501 for a rotary sharpener and 180 for Wopex. The 501 180 was designed by Helmut Hufnagl and is made in Taiwan.
The Video
Here’s a video where I compare the 501 180 to two other rotary sharpeners.
Clipping the pencils’ points off at about 7:30 really hurt and felt rather wasteful, but wasting so much good pencil when the auto stop of the other two sharpeners didn’t work was of course even more wasteful (…even though it didn’t hurt so much, maybe because the machine did the crippling of the pencils).
Tip: Open the video in YouTube, you can then play it at higher speeds, e.g. 1.5x.
Here’s a little table comparing the different points created by the three different sharpeners.
Sharpener: | Deli 0635 | Staedtler 501 180 | Deli 0620 |
---|---|---|---|
Angle: | 17° | 19° | 17° |
..and here are the different points made by the different sharpeners.
The Auto Stop
There is just so much less material wasted when the auto stop works. If you don’t have the 501 180 and your sharpener’s auto stop doesn’t work, have a look at the end of the video where I show a way of dealing with this problem. I am mentioning this simple trick here because my simplest videos seem most appreciated (e.g. how to refill a mechanical pencil), while my complex videos (e.g. the DelGuard pen force test) remain rather unloved.
I have added the Wopex Mars 501 180 to the list of sharpeners, sorted by angle.
Many thanks to Benedikt Schindler for his help in getting the 501 180 to me in the UK.
References
↑1 | …because I switched to using a protractor when measuring angles I want to stick with this method so that all pencil points are measured the same way. |
---|---|
↑2 | …with Johnny being the most determined defender in the Erasable group on Facebook. Thank you for that. |
↑3 | As expressed previously, for various reasons I am not keen on the expression ‘toothy paper’, but since this is a direct quote it will be one of the few occasions you can find this word in this blog |
↑4 | Yes, I learned that expression when I watched the English version of Star Trek Voyager. |
↑5 | I try to avoid using the word perfect, but in this case it is justified, I think. |
Thanks for this comprehensive review, complete with video. And what cool graphics in the video!
I am having the urge to try the WOPEX again. It was announced in 2009 – there must have been some refinements to the production process over the years. I also wish I could locally buy the eraserless version!
Thank you for your comment.
If you are referring to the moving labels, I like this effect, too 8^) It’s also used in the Orenznero video.
The Wopex has changed. They are slimmer now, but not much. The HB lead is pretty similar, but a bit different I think. 2B and 2H are very(!) different now.
Thanks for sharing this! You know how I feel about the Wopex. 🙂 Luckily, the neons make it easier to convert the youngsters I know to the cause. Have they done away with the salmon/blue/green (2B/HB/2H) versions completely?
Thank you for your comment.
I am happy that you keep defending the Wopex, a Sisyphus task, when I think of the number of people on the other side. I thought I mentioned you by name, but must have overlooked that in the end, I have added your name now.
The old 2B and 2H are gone. You can still get single coloured pencils from Wopex material in similar colours though.
I noticed that the new Noris eco pencils don’t have the thin black strip on the sides, like the old Noris eco or the Tradition. Instead the sides of the hexagonal body are black and green, alternating. Not as nice as the old version…
We need more wopex love – especially if you use them on watercolour paper. I have a hoard of them just for using on watercolour paper.
I wish I could get the lead from wopex for leadholders. It is different than the other staedtler leads. (I have both. Seriously, the wopex stays put better when wet down.)
Elizabeth, thank you for this insight. I should try a Wopex wet, just to see how it is.
I guess we’ll have to move to an alternative universe of Wopex fans to get the Wopex lead released for leadholders (I assume the lead could maybe be extruded on it’s own).
Do you happen to know if the S-M 501 and the Dahle 133 are essentially the same machine? The bodies look very close, as do the sharpening profiles I’ve seen on YouTube.
Cole, if by S-M 501you mean Staedtler’s Mars 501 180 then the answer is no. The 501 180 has been developed a few years ago by Helmut Hufnagl ( https://bleistift.blog/2016/10/staedtler-at-insights-x/ ) and is quite different.
Nice find – and a nice solution to the problem of sporadic auto-stopping. I looked on eBay, but at £28, it’s too rich for my blood so I’ll just stick to using the Bleistift Auto-Stop Hack instead!
Any idea what internal changes they’ve made to make the auto-stop work? Nothing jumped out at me when I watched the video. The internal mechanism looked similar to the other two sharpeners.
I am not sure, but Mr Hufnagl, who designed this sharpener, mentioned that there were several problems. He also mentioned that the shavings of the Wopex get statically charged in many sharpeners, but I don’t remember whether that is part of the problem.
Ah, I hadn’t thought about static, but I suppose that would be an issue with the plastic content of the ‘wood shavings’. It’s quite amazing that well into the 21st century, something as humble as the pencil and the pencil sharpener are still the focus of so much care and attention.